Argumentation 17 (1):87-98 (2003)

Abstract
The noctes Atticae of Aulus Gellius contain almost all the ancient paradoxes. Nevertheless, in comparison with his philosophical sources, the author shows a shift in the perspective of his approach. He analyses the `master argument' of Diodorus Chronus only from an ethical point of view and, among the seven paradoxes attributed to Eubulides of Milet, he quotes the `heap' as an absurdity (absurdum), the `horned one' and the `not-someone' as a trap (captio), the `liar' as a sophism (sophisma). Following the advice of Cynics, Gellius mistrusts deceptive manoeuvres, which highlight gaps in binary logic. At the same time, however, he is interested in argumentative structures, which lead one of two opponents on to victory. The extensive report of the quarrel between Protagoras and Evathlus, and many observations of Gellius on convertible forms of reasoning in literary texts fall within this rhetorical field
Keywords Aulus Gellius  fallacy  Megarics  paradoxes  Protagoras  sophism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1022951908973
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,568
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Opus longe humanissimum: Aulus Gellius i Noctes Atticae.Joanna Komorowska - 2010 - Kronos - metafizyka, kultura, religia 4 (15).
Translation in Aulus Gellius.Stephen M. Beall - 1997 - Classical Quarterly 47 (01):215-.
Der Platoniker Tauros in der Darstellung des Aulus Gellius.Harold Tarrant - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):294-296.
What the Liar Taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Paradoxes of Intensionality.Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.
Paradoxes and Hypodoxes of Time Travel.Peter Eldridge-Smith - 2007 - In Jan Lloyd Jones, Paul Campbell & Peter Wylie (eds.), Art and Time. Australian Scholarly Publishing. pp. 172--189.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
19 ( #526,592 of 2,385,739 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #559,864 of 2,385,739 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes