Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):125-151 (2011)
AbstractClimate change and other global environmental problems constitute a significant challenge to contemporary political philosophy, especially with respect to complacency. This paper assesses Rawls? theory, and argues for three conclusions. First, Rawls does not already solve such problems, and simple extensions of his theory are unlikely to do so. This is so despite the rich structure of Rawls? philosophy, and the appeal of some of its parts. Second, the most promising areas for extension ? the circumstances of justice, the duty to maintain and promote just institutions, and his vision of social development ? are those that have not yet been explored. Third, unfortunately, Rawls? views on these topics are both seriously underdeveloped, and largely stipulative. Hence, in trying to meet climate change, Rawlsians are more likely to add new theories to Rawls, and perhaps even to transform his original account, than to generate an approach ?from the inside out?
Similar books and articles
Climate Change and Norman Daniels' Theory of Just Health: An Essay on Basic Needs. [REVIEW]Joseph Lacey - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):3-14.
Disagreement and Responses to Climate Change.Graham Long - 2011 - Environmental Values 20 (4):503-525.
Environmental Refugees: What Rights? Which Duties?Derek R. Bell - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (2):135-152.
Global Justice and Global Climate Change: A Discussion of the Relationship.Duane Windsor - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:23-34.
Rawls on Kant Is Rawls a Kantian or Kant a Rawlsian?Kerstin Budde - 2007 - European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3):339-358.
Divine Sovereignty and The Global Climate Change Debate.Holly L. Wilson - 2011 - Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):8-15.
On the Concept of Climate Debt: Its Moral and Political Value.Jonathan Pickering & Christian Barry - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):667-685.
Global Warming and the Cosmopolitan Political Conception of Justice.Aaron Maltais - 2008 - Environmental Politics 17 (4):592-609.
Global Warming and Our Natural Duties of Justice.Aaron Maltais - 2008 - Dissertation, Uppsala University
Climate Change and Normativity: Constructivism Versus Realism.Gideon Calder - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):153-169.
Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice.Dale Jamieson - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):431-445.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Debating Climate Ethics Revisited.Stephen M. Gardiner - 2021 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 24 (2):89-111.
Ethics, Equity and the Economics of Climate Change Paper 1: Science and Philosophy.Nicholas Stern - 2014 - Economics and Philosophy 30 (3):397-444.
Citizens in Appropriate Numbers: Evaluating Five Claims About Justice and Population Size.Tim Meijers - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2-3):246-268.
The Anthropocentric Advantage? Environmental Ethics and Climate Change Policy.Nicole Hassoun - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):235-257.
The Construction of a Sustainable Development in Times of Climate Change.Eric Brandstedt - 2013 - Dissertation, Lund University
References found in this work
The Law of Peoples: With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Political Theory and International Relations.Charles R. Beitz - 1979 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.