Sign Systems Studies 47 (3-4):627-640 (2019)

Authors
Arran Gare
Swinburne University of Technology
Abstract
The Nineteenth Annual Biosemotics Gathering was hosted by the Philosophy Faculty of Lomonsov Moscow State University. That it was hosted by a philosophy faculty rather than a science faculty, and that it was hosted in Russia, are both significant. Biosemiotics is a challenge to mainstream biology, still struggling to gain acceptance despite the work of a great many researchers and a great many publications, along with nineteen annual biosemiotics gatherings. But it is much more than this, and this accounts for why gaining acceptance is so difficult. In Thomas Kuhn’s terminology, it is revolutionary science, not normal science. It has not yet achieved a consensus on philosophical issues, basic concepts and methods that allows its practitioners to get on with the business of puzzle solving and forget about philosophy. More importantly, it is a challenge not only to mainstream assumptions in biology but also a challenge to deeper assumptions about what counts as science, what is science, and what is the relationship between science and other cultural fields. It is also a challenge to the broader culture of modernity with its tacit acceptance of Cartesian dualism, manifest in the division between the sciences and the humanities.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics  Biosemiotics  Peirce
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Darwin Got Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 2010 - Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
The Physics of Mind and Thought.Brian Josephson - 2019 - Activitas Nervosa Superior 61:86–90.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The 7th Gathering in Biosemiotics — a Review.Yair Neuman - 2007 - Sign Systems Studies 35 (1-2):301-303.
Gathering in Biosemiotics 6, Salzburg 2006.Günther Witzany & Maricela Yip - 2007 - Sign Systems Studies 35 (1-2):295-299.
Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. [REVIEW]Paul Cobley - 2008 - American Journal of Semiotics 24 (1/3):201-204.
What is Actually Essential in Biosemiotics?Davide Weible - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):366-382.
Umberto Eco on the Biosemiotics of Giorgio Prodi.Kalevi Kull - 2018 - Sign Systems Studies 46 (2/3):352-364.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-16

Total views
87 ( #125,400 of 2,455,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #50,673 of 2,455,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes