Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences
Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):410-414 (2009)
In contrast to most Western countries, routine offer of prenatal screening is considered problematic in the Netherlands. The main argument against offering it to every pregnant woman is that women would be brought into a moral dilemma when deciding whether to use screening or not. This paper explores whether the active offer of a prenatal screening test indeed confronts women with a moral dilemma. A qualitative study was developed, based on a randomised controlled trial that aimed to assess the decision-making process of women when confronted with a test offer. A sample of 59 women was interviewed about the different factors balanced in decision-making. Participants felt themselves caught between a need for knowledge and their unwillingness to take on responsibility. Conflict was reported between wishes, preferences and ethical views regarding parenthood; however, women did not seem to be caught in a choice between two or more ethical principles. Participants balanced the interests of the family against that of the fetus in line with their values and their personal circumstances. Therefore, we conclude that they are not so much faced with an ethical dilemma as conflicting interests. We propose that caregivers should provide the opportunity for the woman to discuss her wishes and doubts to facilitate her decision. This approach would help women to assess the meaning of testing within their parental duties towards their unborn child and their current offspring
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Should Non-Invasiveness Change Informed Consent Procedures for Prenatal Diagnosis?Zuzana Deans & Ainsley J. Newson - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (2):122-132.
Moral Implications of Obstetric Technologies for Pregnancy and Motherhood.Susanne Brauer - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):45-54.
Similar books and articles
Women's Views on the Moral Status of Nature in the Context of Prenatal Screening Decisions.E. Garcia, D. R. M. Timmermans & E. van Leeuwen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):461-465.
Ethical Issues Related to Screening for Preeclampsia.Jennifer M. Jørgensen, Paula L. Hedley, Mickey Gjerris & Michael Christiansen - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (7):360-367.
Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Emotional Engagement in Professional Ethics.W. Scott Dunbar - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):535-551.
The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Problem. [REVIEW]De Haan Jurriaan - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):267-284.
Personal Values: Potential Keys to Ethical Decision Making. [REVIEW]David J. Fritzsche - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (11):909 - 922.
Ethics in Nursing: Cases, Principles, and Reasoning.Martin Benjamin - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Confusion and a Clarification. [REVIEW]Edgar Morscher - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):485-491.
The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics.Raymond de Vries - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):419-430.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads26 ( #195,892 of 2,169,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,290 of 2,169,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?