Recovering Quantum Logic Within an Extended Classical Framework

Erkenntnis 78 (2):399-419 (2013)
Abstract
We present a procedure which allows us to recover classical and nonclassical logical structures as concrete logics associated with physical theories expressed by means of classical languages. This procedure consists in choosing, for a given theory ${{\mathcal{T}}}$ and classical language ${{\fancyscript{L}}}$ expressing ${{\mathcal{T}}, }$ an observative sublanguage L of ${{\fancyscript{L}}}$ with a notion of truth as correspondence, introducing in L a derived and theory-dependent notion of C-truth (true with certainty), defining a physical preorder $\prec$ induced by C-truth, and finally selecting a set of sentences ϕ V that are verifiable (or testable) according to ${{\mathcal{T}}, }$ on which a weak complementation ⊥ is induced by ${{\mathcal{T}}. }$ The triple $(\phi_{V},\prec,^{\perp})$ is then the desired concrete logic. By applying this procedure we recover a classical logic and a standard quantum logic as concrete logics associated with classical and quantum mechanics, respectively. The latter result is obtained in a purely formal way, but it can be provided with a physical meaning by adopting a recent interpretation of quantum mechanics that reinterprets quantum probabilities as conditional on detection rather than absolute. Hence quantum logic can be considered as a mathematical structure formalizing the properties of the notion of verification in quantum physics. This conclusion supports the general idea that some nonclassical logics can coexist without conflicting with classical logic (global pluralism) because they formalize metalinguistic notions that do not coincide with the notion of truth as correspondence but are not alternative to it either
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-011-9353-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Conjectures and Refutations.K. R. Popper - 1966 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Philosophy of Logic.W. V. Quine - 1970 - Harvard University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Truth Versus Testability in Quantum Logic.Claudio Garola - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (2):197 - 222.
A New Approach to Quantum Logic.J. L. Bell - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):83-99.
Only If Quanta Had Logic.James H. McGrath - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:268 - 275.
Logic, Probability, and Quantum Theory.Arthur I. Fine - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (2):101-111.
Logic, Quantum Logic and Empiricism.John Bell & Michael Hallett - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):355-379.
Substitution and Truth in Quantum Logic.Itamar Pitowsky - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):380-401.
On the Logical Origins of Quantum Mechanics Demonstrated by Using Clifford Algebra.Elio Conte - 2011 - Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics 8 (25):109-126.
Quantum Logic and Meaning.Geoffrey Hellman - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:493 - 511.
Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature?Peter Mittelstaedt - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):215-222.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-13

Total downloads

31 ( #165,534 of 2,169,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,573 of 2,169,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums