Saved by disaster? Abrupt climate change, political inertia, and the possibility of an intergenerational arms race

Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):140-162 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional concern for the gradual, incremental effects of climate change remains; but now greater attention is being paid to the possibility of breaching major thresholds in the climate system with catastrophic consequences. It might be thought that the potential for abrupt climate change (a) undermines the usual (economic, psychological, and intergenerational) analyses of the climate change problem, and (b) in doing so helps us to act.  Against this, I argue both that much of the psychological and intergenerational analyses remains in place, and that abrupt climate change may make action more difficult, perhaps even setting off an intergenerational arms race.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,181

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
477 (#20,982)

6 months
1 (#413,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen M. Gardiner
University of Washington

Citations of this work

Human Enhancement and the Proper Response to Climate Change.James Fanciullo - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (1):85-96.
Moral Progress and Canada's Climate Failure.Byron Williston - 2011 - Journal of Global Ethics 7 (2):149 - 160.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references