Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):140-162 (2009)

Stephen M. Gardiner
University of Washington
Traditional concern for the gradual, incremental effects of climate change remains; but now greater attention is being paid to the possibility of breaching major thresholds in the climate system with catastrophic consequences. It might be thought that the potential for abrupt climate change (a) undermines the usual (economic, psychological, and intergenerational) analyses of the climate change problem, and (b) in doing so helps us to act.  Against this, I argue both that much of the psychological and intergenerational analyses remains in place, and that abrupt climate change may make action more difficult, perhaps even setting off an intergenerational arms race.
Keywords climate justice  adaptation  environmental justice  climate ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01444.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Progress and Canada's Climate Failure.Byron Williston - 2011 - Journal of Global Ethics 7 (2):149 - 160.
Human Enhancement and the Proper Response to Climate Change.James Fanciullo - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (1):85-96.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
472 ( #16,194 of 2,444,822 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #311,140 of 2,444,822 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes