Teleologies and the Methodology of Epistemology

In David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 31-45 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The teleological approach to an epistemic concept investigates it by asking questions such as ‘what is the purpose of the concept?’, ‘What role has it played in the past?’, or ‘If we imagine a society without the concept, why would they feel the need to invent it?’ The idea behind the teleological approach is that examining the function of the concept illuminates the contours of the concept itself. This approach is a relatively new development in epistemology, and as yet there are few works examining it. This paper aims to fill this gap and engender further understanding of the teleological method. I first contrast the teleological method with more orthodox approaches in epistemology. I then draw a three-way taxonomy of different kinds of teleological approach and provide an example of each kind. The teleological approach is often presented as antithetical to the more orthodox approaches in epistemology, and so in competition with them. I demur. I argue that the methods can be fruitfully combined in epistemological theorising; in the final section I suggest specific ways the teleological approach can be incorporated alongside more orthodox methods in a general methodological reflective equilibrium.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Norms and Epistemological Methods.Jared Guy Bates - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology.David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.
The Nature and Development of the Teleological Stance.Deborah Ann Kelemen - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Against Knowledge-First Epistemology.Mikkel Gerken - 2018 - In Gordon and Jarvis Carter (ed.), Knowledge-First Approaches in Epistemology and Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 46-71.
Intention and teleology.Matthew Hanser - 1995 - Mind 107 (426):381-401.
Darwin was a teleologist.James G. Lennox - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.
Kant on biological teleology: Towards a two-level interpretation.Marcel Quarfood - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):735-747.
Teleology, consequentialism, and the past.Peter Vallentyne - 1988 - Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101.
Teleological Reasons.Douglas W. Portmore - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Disposition and Latent Teleology in Descartes’s Philosophy.Lynda Gaudemard - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):293-308.


Added to PP

888 (#15,344)

6 months
96 (#40,403)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Georgi Gardiner
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

References found in this work

The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology.Duncan Pritchard - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (3):247-279.
Virtue Epistemology.John Turri, Mark Alfano & John Greco - 1999 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:1-51.

View all 23 references / Add more references