The conventional status of reflexive awareness: What's at stake in a tibetan debate?

Philosophy East and West 56 (2):201-228 (2006)
Jay Garfield
Smith College
‘Ju Mipham Rinpoche, (1846-1912) an important figure in the _Ris med_, or non- sectarian movement influential in Tibet in the late 19<sup>th</sup> and early 20<sup>th</sup> Centuries, was an unusual scholar in that he was a prominent _Nying ma_ scholar and _rDzog_ _chen_ practitioner with a solid dGe lugs education. He took dGe lugs scholars like Tsong khapa and his followers seriously, appreciated their arguments and positions, but also sometimes took issue with them directly. In his commentary to Candrak¥rti’s _Madhyamakåvatåra, _Mi pham argues that Tsong khapa is wrong to take Candrak¥rti’s rejection of the reflexive character of consciousness to be a rejection of the _conventional _existence of reflexive awareness. Instead, he argues, Candrak¥rti only intends to reject the reflexivity of awareness _ultimately_, and, indeed, Mipham argues, it is simply _obvious _that conventionally, consciousness is reflexive
Keywords Awareness  Consciousness  Metaphysics  Reflection  Candrakirti  Rinpoche, 'ju Mipham  Tsong Kha-pa
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2006.0020
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,035
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
197 ( #30,282 of 2,312,700 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #146,983 of 2,312,700 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature