The Tollgate Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering: Moving Beyond the Oxford Principles to an Ethically More Robust Approach

Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (2):143-174 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article offers a constructive critique of the Oxford Principles for the governance of geoengineering and proposes an alternative set of principles, the Tollgate Principles, based on that critique. Our main concern is that, despite their many merits, the Oxford Principles remain largely instrumental and dominated by procedural considerations; therefore, they fail to lay the groundwork sufficiently for the more substantive ethical debate that is needed. The article aims to address this gap by making explicit many of the important ethical questions lurking in the background, especially around values such as justice, respect and legitimacy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consenting to Geoengineering.Pak-Hang Wong - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):173-188.
Why Geoengineering is Not Plan B.Stephen Gardiner & Augustin Fragnière - 2016 - In Christopher Preston (ed.), Climate Justice and Geoengineering. Rowman and Littlefield.
Distributive Justice, Geoengineering and Risks.Pak-Hang Wong - 2014 - The Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Papers.
Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation.Jack Stilgoe - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):851-869.
Putting the Tollgate Principles Into Practice.David R. Morrow - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (2):175-177.
Geoengineering Tensions.Adrian Currie - forthcoming - Futures.
Robust Harms.Isaac Taylor - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (1):69-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-13

Downloads
38 (#304,287)

6 months
8 (#96,308)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stephen M. Gardiner
University of Washington
Augustin Fragnière
University of Washington

Citations of this work

Fighting Risk with Risk: Solar Radiation Management, Regulatory Drift, and Minimal Justice.Jonathan Wolff - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5):564-583.
A Mission-Driven Research Program on Solar Geoengineering Could Promote Justice and Legitimacy.David R. Morrow - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5):618-640.
Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance.Daniel Edward Callies - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):324-340.
Geoengineering, Political Legitimacy and Justice.Stephen M. Gardiner & Augustin Fragnière - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):265-269.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations