Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (2):143-174 (2018)

Augustin Fragnière
University of Washington
Stephen M. Gardiner
University of Washington
ABSTRACTThis article offers a constructive critique of the Oxford Principles for the governance of geoengineering and proposes an alternative set of principles, the Tollgate Principles, based on that critique. Our main concern is that, despite their many merits, the Oxford Principles remain largely instrumental and dominated by procedural considerations; therefore, they fail to lay the groundwork sufficiently for the more substantive ethical debate that is needed. The article aims to address this gap by making explicit many of the important ethical questions lurking in the background, especially around values such as justice, respect and legitimacy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/21550085.2018.1509472
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Core Precautionary Principle.Stephen M. Gardiner - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1):33–60.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance.Daniel Edward Callies - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):324-340.
Fighting Risk with Risk: Solar Radiation Management, Regulatory Drift, and Minimal Justice.Jonathan Wolff - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5):564-583.
A Mission-Driven Research Program on Solar Geoengineering Could Promote Justice and Legitimacy.David R. Morrow - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5):618-640.
Geoengineering, Political Legitimacy and Justice.Stephen M. Gardiner & Augustin Fragnière - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):265-269.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consenting to Geoengineering.Pak-Hang Wong - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):173-188.
Why Geoengineering is Not Plan B.Stephen Gardiner & Augustin Fragnière - 2016 - In Christopher Preston (ed.), Climate Justice and Geoengineering. Rowman and Littlefield.
Distributive Justice, Geoengineering and Risks.Pak-Hang Wong - 2014 - The Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Papers.
Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation.Jack Stilgoe - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):851-869.
Putting the Tollgate Principles Into Practice.David R. Morrow - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (2):175-177.
Geoengineering Tensions.Adrian Currie - forthcoming - Futures.
Robust Harms.Isaac Taylor - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (1):69-85.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #476,465 of 2,421,209 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,421,209 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes