What if some patients are more “important” than others? A possible framework for Covid-19 and other emergency care situations

BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-11 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic caused situations where, in some hospitals, there were more patients in need of urgent treatment in intensive care units (ICU) than were available. In particular, there were not sufficient ventilators or critical care resources for all patients in danger of dying from respiratory failure or other organ failures.DiscussionAs the “first come, first served” criterion was not considered adequate, more nuanced and fairer clinical criteria were proposed to assess whom to treat first. One type of patients that has not been considered in the literature so far is that of “important patients”, individuals that many people might consider worthy of priority treatment for the contribution they made or might make to society as a whole.SummaryIn this article, we discuss the moral insights behind the possible treatment of “important patients” and suggest a supererogatory solution of voluntary renunciation/withdrawal. Details of the proposal are explained, and potential objections are addressed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

COVID-19: The imposter in our emergency department.William Wilson - 2021 - Research and Humanities in Medical Education 8:42-44.
Changes of health care practice in the field of ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic.Sibel Inan - 2021 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 31 (1):55-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-14

Downloads
4 (#1,426,245)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?