What Leibniz really said?
In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press (2008)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Did Leibniz Fail to Complete His Dynamics?Stephen Howard - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):22-40.
On Kant’s Knowledge of Leibniz’ Metaphysics—a Reply to Garber.Stefan Storrie - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (4):1147-1155.
Conhecimento humano e a ideia de afecção na Ética de Espinosa.Levy Lia - 2013 - Analytica (Rio) 17 (2): 221-247.
Similar books and articles
Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy.Daniel Garber - 1995 - In Nicholas Jolley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press. pp. 270--352.
Comments on Daniel Garber's Metaphysics and Theology: The Role of the Monadology in Leibniz's Essais de Théodicée.Jeffrey K. McDonough - manuscript
Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Comments on Daniel Garber's Leibniz: Body, Substance Monad for the Eastern.Jeffrey McDonough - unknown
Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW]Stephen Puryear - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2009-01-28
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
