Why the new theorist may still need to explain cognitive significance but not mind doing it

Philosophia 28 (1-4):455-465 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In "Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?", Howard Wettstein denies that semantics must account for cognitive significance. He thus rejects Frege's condition of adequacy for semantics and rids the new theorists from seemingly intractable puzzles. In a more recent article, Wettstein claims that not only reference but even cognitive significance is not a matter of how the referent is presented to the mind of the speaker. In this paper, I submit that the crucial element in the debate between new theorists and neo-Fregeans concerning the semantic significance of language is the connection between semantic matters and the human thougth.

Similar books and articles

¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein.David Suarez-Rivero - 2016 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 20 (3):427-453.
Cognitive Significance.Aidan Gray - 2021 - In Heimir Geirsson & Stephen Biggs (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York: Routledge.
Meaning, Reference and Cognitive Significance.Kenneth A. Taylor - 1995 - Mind and Language 10 (1-2):129-180.
Direct Reference Theory and Modes of Presentation.Naomi Shiraishi - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
The wettstein/salmon debate: Critique and resolution.Marga Reimer - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):130–151.
Has semantics rested on a mistake?: and other essays.Howard K. Wettstein - 1991 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
369 (#56,973)

6 months
97 (#50,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pieranna Garavaso
University of Minnesota, Morris

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Has semantics rested on a mistake?Howard Wettstein - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):185-209.
Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?Howard Wettstein - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):185-209.
Has semantics rested on a mistake?: and other essays.Howard K. Wettstein - 1991 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references