Who was the Founder of Empiricism After All? Gassendi and the 'Logic' of Bacon

Perspectives on Science 29 (3):327-354 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contentions about the origin of early modern empiricism have been floating about at least since the 1980s, where its exclusive “Britishness” was initially question, and the name of Gassendi was provocatively put forward as the putative “founder” of the current to the detriment of Francis Bacon. Recent scholarship has shown that early modern empiricism did not derive from philosophical speculation exclusively but had multiple sources and “foundations.” Yet, from a historical viewpoint, the question whether Bacon’s method had any influence on the origin and development of Gassendi’s version of empiricism still carries significance, for its answer may open up different views on how the relation between British and “continental” empiricisms shall be framed. In this paper, I deal with Gassendi’s reception of Bacon. On the basis of a deep examination of Gassendi’s corpus, I contend that there is no trace of a consistent influence of Bacon on Gassendi’s empiricism before 1650s; although I show that an indirect influence can be found through the mediation of Peiresc, I put forward the hypothesis that it was more the empirical attitude characterizing Peiresc’s intellectual figure, rather than his interest in Baconianism, to be relevant, along with Epicurus’ philosophy, for Gassendi’s early empiricism. I then analyze Gassendi’s treatment of Bacon’s logic in Gassendi’s Syntagma philosophicum. I show that despite Gassendi’s sympathy for Bacon’s project, his own logic lays on fundamentally different assumptions. Despite this, I argue for Gassendi’s reception of Bacon’s theory of the idols in Syntagma philosophicum. On this basis, I conclude by restating the untenability of “national” accounts of the rise of empiricism, and the importance of highlighting instead the sharing of ideas between its actors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,119

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Flesh Vs. Mind: A Study of the Debate Between Descartes and Gassendi.Antonia Lolordo - 2001 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Gassendi's interplay between skepticism and empiricism.Gianni Paganini - 2018 - In Delphine Bellis, Daniel Garber & Carla Rita Palmerino (eds.), Pierre Gassendi: Humanism, Science, and the Birth of Modern Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Pierre Gassendi.Margaret J. Osler - 2002 - In Steven M. Nadler (ed.), A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 80–95.
Gassendi on human knowledge of the mind.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (1):1-21.
Was Gassendi an Epicurean?Monte Ransome Johnson - 2003 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):339 - 360.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-18

Downloads
22 (#816,353)

6 months
10 (#616,839)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Pierre gassendi.Saul Fisher - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations