Arguing as a Virtuous Arguer Would Argue

Informal Logic 35 (4):467-487 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A virtue approach to argumentation would focus on the arguers’ character rather than the arguments. Therefore, it must be explained how good arguments relate to virtuous arguers. This article focus on this issue and attempts to provide an answer to the question: Could a bad arguer produce a good argument? It is argued that, besides the usual logical, dialectical, and rhetorical standards, a virtuously produced good argument must meet two additional requirements: the arguer must be in a specific state of mind, and the argument must be broadly conceived of as an argumentative interaction and thus excel from every perspective.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Fallacies Vices?Andrew Ball - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):423-429.
Arguments that Backfire.Daniel H. Cohen - 2005 - In D. Hitchcock & D. Farr (eds.), The Uses of Argument. OSSA. pp. 58-65.
Arguing forever? Or: Two tiers of argument appraisal.Trudy Govier - 1997 - In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale & A. V. Colman (eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric. Vale.
Virtuous argumentation and the challenges of hype.Adam Auch - 2013 - Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation 10: Virtues of Argumentation.
Virtue and Arguers.José Ángel Gascón - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):441-450.


Added to PP

29 (#524,468)

6 months
3 (#928,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

José A. Gascón
University of Murcia

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references