Isis 98:769-778 (2007)

Using Dava Sobel’s best‐sellling Longitude as its departure point, this essay considers the varying goals of the popular and the academic historian of science. It argues that, though there is common ground, there are major differences between the two in terms of style, use of evidence, approach to context, and thematic focus. Nonetheless, academics have much to learn from writers such as Sobel in addressing a wider audience and relating specialized studies to wider concerns
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/529268
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Swedenborg's Lunars.Simon Schaffer - 2014 - Annals of Science 71 (1):1-25.
Telling Stories.Aileen Fyfe & Paul Smith - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Science 36 (4):471-476.
Viii. Telegraphic Determination of the Longitude of Kimberley.W. L. Elkin - 1881 - Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society 3 (2):26-26.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,042,618 of 2,349,854 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #120,693 of 2,349,854 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes