The Fables of Pity: Rousseau, Mandeville and the Animal-Fable

Derrida Today 5 (1):21-38 (2012)

Abstract
Prompted by Derrida's work on the animal-fable in eighteenth-century debates about political power, this article examines the role played by the fiction of the animal in thinking of pity as either a natural virtue (in Rousseau's Second Discourse) or as a natural passion (in Mandeville's The Fable of the Bees). The war of fables between Rousseau and Mandeville – and their hostile reception by Samuel Johnson and Adam Smith – reinforce that the animal-fable illustrates not so much the proper of man as the possibilities and limitations of a moral philosophy that is unable to address the political realities of the state
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/drt.2012.0026
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,780
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Of Grammatology.Jacques Derrida - 1998 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
The Animal That Therefore I Am.Jacques Derrida - 2002 - Fordham University Press.
Of Grammatology.Jacques Derrida - 1982 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 15 (1):66-70.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-26

Total views
36 ( #235,014 of 2,264,845 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #363,397 of 2,264,845 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature