“Jurisdictional Realization of Law” as Judicium: A Methodological Alternative, Beyond Deductive Application and Finalistic Decision


Abstract
The proposed reflection intends to present the problem of judicial adjudication as a substantially-axiologically founded autonomous moment on the practical realization of law, and to explore this understanding in confrontation with external exigencies, mostly teleologically determined—hence, beyond strict deductive application, as a syllogistic reference of facts to norms, and finalistically determined decision, as an option among possible alternatives to achieve specific aims. The main objective is to enter into a discussion on the methodological meaning of “integrity”, “hard cases” and “right answer”, as presented by Ronald Dworkin, and a critical reflection on the criticism of that approach levelled by Neil MacCormick, so as to confront the relevance of principle and policy arguments, in order to bring about a different methodological approach, an alternative jurisprudentialist conception of adjudication, incorporating a practical-normative constitutive dialectics between legal controversy and legal system, such as that presented by Castanheira Neves. The focus will, then, be the legitimacy of the connection of arguments of principle and consequentialist arguments in adjudication, its selection and its justification, stating, therefore, a specifically assumed judicium, a judicative decision, having the legal system as its horizon of normative reference and of substantial and institutional autonomy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11196-019-09668-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,865
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Law's Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Ethics 97 (4):834-860.
Taking Rights Seriously.R. Dworkin - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):379-380.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Formal Aspects of Legal Reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Dworkin on the Value of Integrity.Jonathan Crowe - 2007 - Deakin Law Review 12:167.
Morals and Interpretation: A Path to Dworkin's Jurisprudence.Chinedu Januarius Onyebadi - 2001 - Dissertation, Universite Catholique de Louvain (Belgium)
The Rehabilitation of Practical Reasoning and the Persistence of Deductivism: An Impossible Challenge?José Manuel Aroso Linhares - forthcoming - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-20.
Legal Pluralism.Natalie Stoljar - 1994 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Ex Aequo Et Bono Versus Hard Cases in the Light of Modern Metaethics.Izabela Skoczeń - 2018 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 9 (1):91-110.
Legal Philosophy in America.Brian Bix - 2008 - In Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
A Formal Model of Adjudication Dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-23

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature