Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687 (2002)

Authors
Christopher Gauker
University of Salzburg
Abstract
Carruthers labels as “too strong” the thesis that language is necessary for all conceptual thought. Languageless creatures certainly do think, but when we get clear about what is meant by “conceptual thought,” it appears doubtful that conceptual thought is possible without language.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x02360126
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,949
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Language as an Instrument of Thought.Eran Asoulin - 2016 - Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
186 ( #50,788 of 2,409,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #347,988 of 2,409,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes