Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687 (2002)
Carruthers labels as “too strong” the thesis that language is necessary for all conceptual thought. Languageless creatures certainly do think, but when we get clear about what is meant by “conceptual thought,” it appears doubtful that conceptual thought is possible without language.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Language as an Instrument of Thought.Eran Asoulin - 2016 - Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23.
Similar books and articles
Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Stimulus-Independence and the Generality Constraint.Elisabeth Camp - manuscript
Language and Conceptual Development: Words as Essence Placeholders.Fei Xu - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):704-705.
Conceptual Dependency as the Language of Thought.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):275-96.
You Don't Say: Figurative Language and Thought.Gregory A. Bryant & Raymond W. Gibbs - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):678-679.
On the Alleged Priority of Thought Over Language.Christopher Gauker - 2007 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 125.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads140 ( #33,272 of 2,158,310 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #133,489 of 2,158,310 )
How can I increase my downloads?