British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):199-204 (2010)

Berys Gaut
University of St. Andrews
In Only a Promise of Happiness Alexander Nehamas holds that beauty is the object of love. I raise three objections to this claim when formulated in terms of personal love: love is too narrow in scope to be the attitude whose formal object is beauty; one can experience a person's beauty but have no love for her; and love is of particulars, not of attributes, however specific, such as beauty. A second kind of love, hedonic love, is too broad in scope to be the attitude whose formal object is beauty. I also argue, contra Nehamas, that inner beauty exists
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayq003
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,185
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Empirical Case for Moral Beauty.Panos Paris - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (4):642-656.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Soma and Psyche.Richard Shusterman - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (3):205-223.
Is Beauty a Pure Perfection?Raphael Bexten - 2010 - Sammelpunkt. Elektronisch Archivierte Theorie.
Beauty, Desire and Ignorance.Christopher Mole - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (4):581 – 593.
Beauty and the Destitution of Technology.Joseph K. Cosgrove - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):109-125.
Why is Socrates Absurd Question Absurd? (Plato, Symposium 199 C 6-D 7).Denis O’Brien - 2010 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):4-26.


Added to PP index

Total views
98 ( #111,313 of 2,454,971 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,801 of 2,454,971 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes