The Lockean theory of communication
Noûs 26 (3):303-324 (1992)
Abstract
The Lockean theory of communication is here defined as the theory that communication takes place when a hearer grasps some sort of mental object, distinct from the speaker's words, that the speaker's words express. This theory contrasts with the view that spoken languages are the very medium of a kind of thought of which overt speech is the most basic form. This article is a critique of some of the most common motives for adopting a Lockean theory of communication. It is not enough that words in some sense express thoughts. It is not enough that animals and prelinguistic infants in some sense think. It is not enough that speakers mean something by what they say or that hearers must understand a speaker's presuppositions. On the contrary, any explanation of how children can learn to communicate in the way the Lockean imagines will presuppose that words can instill beliefs in some way more fundamental than the Lockean theory itself can explain.Author's Profile
DOI
10.2307/2215956
My notes
Similar books and articles
'States of the common and the unique': An introduction to a general functional communication theory.Fee-Alexandra Haase - manuscript
Cosmopolitan Communication and the Broken Dream of a Common Language.Niclas Rönnström - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):260-282.
Self-ownership and the Lockean proviso.Tibor R. Machan - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Sign and Meaning: A Semiotic Approach to Communication.Codruţa Porcar - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):20-29.
The pragmatics of 'never tell too plainly': Indirect communication in Chan buddhism.Youru Wang - 2000 - Asian Philosophy 10 (1):7 – 31.
Social externalism and linguistic communication.Christopher Gauker - 2003 - In Maria J. Frapolli & E. Romero (eds.), Meaning, Basic Self-Knowledge, and Mind: Essays on Tyler Burge. CSLI.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
145 (#88,293)
6 months
3 (#225,062)
2009-01-28
Downloads
145 (#88,293)
6 months
3 (#225,062)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
I don't think so: Pinker on the mentalese monopoly.David J. Cole - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (3):283-295.
An extraterrestrial perspective on conceptual development.Christopher Gauker - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (1):105-30.
Utterance content, speaker’s intentions and linguistic liability.Claudia Picazo Jaque - 2017 - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 32 (3):329.
Avoidance of cognitive efforts as a risk factor in interaction.Alla Baikulova & Arto Mustajoki - 2022 - Discourse Studies 24 (3):269-290.