What is Deontology?, Part Two: Reasons to Act Gerald F. Gaus
Part One of this essay considered familiar ways of characterizing deontology, which focus on the notions of the good and the right. Here we will take up alternative approaches, which stress the type of reasons for actions that are generated by deontological theories. Although some of these alternative conceptualizations of deontology also employ a distinction between the good and the right, all mark the basic contrast between deontology and teleology in terms of reasons to act
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Deontology and Defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
What is Deontology? Part Two: Reasons to Act. [REVIEW]Gerald F. Gaus - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2):179-193.
What is Deontology? Part One: Orthodox Views. [REVIEW]Gerald F. Gaus - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (1):27-42.
Teleology, Deontology, and the Priority of the Right: On Some Unappreciated Distinctions.Miriam Ronzoni - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):453 - 472.
The Practice of Medical Ethics: A Structuralistic Approach.William J. Ellos - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
The Demands of Deontology Are Not So Paradoxical.Judith André - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:407-410.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #76,253 of 2,158,945 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,945 )
How can I increase my downloads?