What is Deontology?, Part Two: Reasons to Act Gerald F. Gaus


Authors
Gerald Gaus
University of Arizona
Abstract
Part One of this essay considered familiar ways of characterizing deontology, which focus on the notions of the good and the right. Here we will take up alternative approaches, which stress the type of reasons for actions that are generated by deontological theories. Although some of these alternative conceptualizations of deontology also employ a distinction between the good and the right, all mark the basic contrast between deontology and teleology in terms of reasons to act
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,836
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Violating Strict Deontological Constraints: Excuse or Pardon?Rudolf Schuessler - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (4):587-601.
V—What's Wrong with ‘Deontology’?Jens Timmermann - 2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (1pt1):75-92.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deontology and Defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
What is Deontology? Part Two: Reasons to Act. [REVIEW]Gerald F. Gaus - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2):179-193.
What is Deontology? Part One: Orthodox Views. [REVIEW]Gerald F. Gaus - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (1):27-42.
The Practice of Medical Ethics: A Structuralistic Approach.William J. Ellos - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
The Demands of Deontology Are Not So Paradoxical.Judith Andre - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:407-410.
On the Paradox of Deontology.William H. Shaw - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:393-406.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
68 ( #150,127 of 2,426,008 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,761 of 2,426,008 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes