Do movement planning and control represent independent modules?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We address three issues that might be important in evaluating the validity of the planning–control model: (1) It could be artificial to distinguish between control and planning when control involves the re-planning of a new corrective submovement that overlaps with the initial response; (2) experiments involving illusions are not totally compelling; (3) selectively implicating the superior parietal lobe in movement control and the basal ganglia in movement planning, appears questionable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Planning and Control in Action.Scott Glover - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):57-69.
Planning, Control, and the Illusion of Explanation.David A. Westwood - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):54-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#633,793)

6 months
1 (#413,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references