Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation revisited: A meta-analysis of successful and failed replications


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/xge0000079
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,044
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Model of Dual Attitudes.Timothy D. Wilson, Samuel Lindsey & Tonya Y. Schooler - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (1):101-126.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Flaws Concerning Belief Accounts of Implicit Biases.Baston Rene - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):352-367.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Case for Failed Meta‐Analyses.C. David Naylor - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (2):127-130.
Contextualization Revisited.John J. Gumperz - 1992 - In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (eds.), The Contextualization of Language. John Benjamins. pp. 1992--39.
Meta‐Analysis or Best‐Evidence Synthesis?H. J. Eysenck - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):29-36.
The Woman in the Communist Regime. Meta-Analysis About a Gender Study.Lavinia Betea - 2006 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (14):31-40.
In Context.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
An Illustrated Guide to the Methods of Meta‐Analysis.Alexander J. Sutton, Keith R. Abrams & David R. Jones - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):135-148.
Meta‐Analysis of Repeated Measures Study Designs.Jaime L. Peters & Kerrie L. Mengersen - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):941-950.
Interpretation of Tests of Heterogeneity and Bias in Meta‐Analysis.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):951-957.
A Critique of Hypertension Treatment Trials and of Their Evaluation.John I. S. Robertson - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):149-164.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
15 ( #544,042 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #493,552 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature