Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 32 (1):35-85 (2014)

Authors
Leone Gazziero
Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3
Abstract
Few arguments from the past have stirred up as much interest as Aristotle’s “Third man” and not so many texts have received as much attention as its account in chapter 22 of the Sophistici elenchi. And yet, several issues about both remain highly controversial, starting from the very nature of the argument at stake and the exact signification of some of its features. The essay provides a close commentary of the text, dealing with its main difficulties and suggesting an overall interpretation of Aristotle’s discussion of the “Third Man” argument.
Keywords Plato  Parmenides  Ideas  Third Man Argument  metapysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.Gregory Vlastos - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (3):319-349.
Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy.Harold F. Cherniss - 1944 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Separation and Immanence in Plato's Theory of Forms.Daniel T. Devereux - 1994 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12:63-90.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-15

Total views
262 ( #27,976 of 2,324,549 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #35,762 of 2,324,549 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes