Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident (Doxography Matters)

Acta Philosophica 24 (2):333-354 (2015)

Leone Gazziero
Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3
Scholarly dissatisfaction with Aristotle’s fallacy of accident has traditionally focused on his examples, whose compatibility with the fallacy’s definition has been doubted time and again. Besides a unified account of the fallacy of accident itself, the paper provides a formalized analysis of its several examples in Aristotle’s Sophistici elenchi. The most problematic instances are dealt with by means of an internal reconstruction of their features as conveyed by Aristotle’s text and an extensive survey of their interpretation in the Byzantine and Latin exegetical tradition. Carefully handled a doxographical approach, as opposed to rapid results oriented practices, proves to be most effective in that it supplies both useful albeit ordinarily overlooked insights and a comprehensive framework of reference for further investigations.
Keywords History of Philosophy  Ancient Philosophy  Aristotle  Sophistici elenchi  Fallacy of accident  Fallacy of consequent  Logic  Argument  Medieval Logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fallacies of Accident.David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
The Textbook Case of Affirming the Consequent.David Socher - 2001 - Teaching Philosophy 24 (3):241-251.
Aristotelian Accidents.Theodor Ebert - 1998 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16:133-159.
The Lord Scroop Fallacy.Herman E. Stark - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).
Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech?Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):281-294.


Added to PP index

Total views
433 ( #12,853 of 2,290,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #13,830 of 2,290,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature