Philosophy Compass 12 (2):e12402 (2017)

Authors
Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Abstract
There is a variety of concepts of the divine in the eastern and western theological and philosophical traditions. There is, however, not enough reflection on the logic behind concepts of God and their justification. I clarify some necessary and sufficient conditions any attempt to explicate a concept of God has to take into account. I argue that each concept of God is a cypher for a particular worldview and distinguishes three types of justification frequently used to bestow content on particular concepts of God: philosophical, theological, and scientific. I turn to four fundamental models of the God–world relation and argue that the most promising concept of God is panentheistic, on which the universe is essentially divine but is not exhaustive of the divine being.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12402
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Propositional Faith: What It is and What It is Not.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):357-372.
The Problem of Evil.Peter van Inwagen - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):696-698.
Belief, Faith, and Acceptance.Robert Audi - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1-3):87-102.
Space, Time and Deity. [REVIEW]H. R. Smart - 1929 - Philosophical Review 38 (1):99.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Panentheism: What It Is and Is Not.Raphael Lataster & Purushottama Bilimoria - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (2):49-64.
Hunky Panentheism.Roberto Rodighiero - 2019 - Sophia 58 (4):581-596.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Music, Metaphor, and Aesthetic Concepts.Nick Zangwill - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (1):1-11.
Modes of Presentation: Perceptual Vs Deferential.Francois Recanati - 2001 - In Albert Newen, Ulrich Nortmann & Rainer Stuehlmann-Laeisz (eds.), Building on Frege: New Essays on Sense, Content, and Concept. CSLI Stanford. pp. 197-208.
Concept Empiricism, Content, and Compositionality.Collin Rice - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):567-583.
Demonstrative Concepts Without Reidentification.Philippe Chuard - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):153-201.
Epistemology and Artificial Intelligence.Ian Edwin Pratt - 1987 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Did God Do It? Metaphysical Models and Theological Hermeneutics.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (2):215-231.
The Structure of Lexical Concepts.Ken Daley - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (3):349 - 372.
Essentially Contested Concepts and Semantic Externalism.Simon J. Evnine - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 8 (1):118-140.
“Concept” is a Useful Concept in Developmental Research.Katherine Nelson - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (2):96-101.
What Concept Analysis in Philosophy of Science Should Be.C. Kenneth Waters - 2004 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):29-58.
Religious Concepts and Absolute Conceptions of the World.Randy Ramal - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (2):89-103.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-08

Total views
38 ( #275,223 of 2,433,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,704 of 2,433,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes