Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Ludwig Jaskolla
Munich School of Philosophy
SummaryWe briefly clarify Tetens’s concept of God and argue that there are some problems regarding both the precise formulation of his panentheism as well as its implications for sin and special divine action.
Keywords Cosmology  Handeln Gottes  Kosmologie  Panentheism  Panentheismus  Sin  Special Divine Action  Sünde
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/nzsth-2017-0028
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Panentheism Naturalistic? How Panentheistic Conceptions of Divine Action Imply Dualism.Mikael Leidenhag - 2014 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 19 (2):209-225.
Models of God.Ted Peters - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Ancient and Contemporary Expressions of Panentheism.Chad Meister - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (9):e12436.
Wissenschaft Ist Panentheismus.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2011 - In Göcke Benedikt Paul & Wasmaier-Sailer Margit (eds.), Idealismus und natürliche Theologie. Verlag Karl Alber.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #768,449 of 2,433,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,753 of 2,433,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes