Sophia 53 (3):397-400 (2014)

Authors
Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Abstract
An important task of philosophy is to provide substantial arguments concerning the basic structure of reality and its relation to the ultimate source of everything. Sometimes, philosophers are convinced that there is an absolutely certain starting point within philosophy. More often, however, they suppose that we start with certain intuitions about empirical reality and its source. Based on these intuitions, philosophers try to develop sound arguments with an intelligible logical structure. By this very fact, they place themselves in the realm of public discussion and criticism. There are, though, different kinds of criticism. Good criticism shows that at least one premise in an argument is not true—which is to say that the argument is not sound—or it shows that the premises could be true while the conclusion is false—which is to say that the argument is not valid. Then, there is criticism that is beside the point. It seems to me that the reply to my paper by Latester belongs to the ki ..
Keywords Panentheism  Classical theism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-014-0435-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hunky Panentheism.Roberto Rodighiero - 2019 - Sophia 58 (4):581-596.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Erratum To: Paying the Cost of Skeptical Theism. [REVIEW]Jeff A. Snapper - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):233-234.
Reconsidering Bohr's Reply to EPR.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2001 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--18.
The Ontological Argument Revisited: A Reply to Rowe.Eric Wilson - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):37 - 44.
Paying the Cost of Skeptical Theism.Jeff A. Snapper - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):45-56.
Evil and the Many Universes Response.Jason Megill - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):127-138.
Reply to Professor Craig.Graham Oppy - 1995 - Sophia 34 (2):15-29.
Skeptical Theism.Justin P. McBrayer - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Does Skeptical Theism Lead to Moral Skepticism?Jeff Jordan - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):403 - 417.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.
Wissenschaft Ist Panentheismus.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2011 - In Göcke Benedikt Paul & Wasmaier-Sailer Margit (eds.), Idealismus und natürliche Theologie. Verlag Karl Alber.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-08-30

Total views
27 ( #395,116 of 2,433,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,810 of 2,433,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes