A Critique of A.C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons"

Abstract
A. C. Graham's Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Sciences is the only Western-language translation of the obscure and textually corrupt chapters of the Mozi that purportedly constitute the foundations of ancient Chinese logic. Graham's presentation and interpretation of this difficult material has been largely accepted by scholars. This article questions the soundness of Graham's reconstruction of these chapters . Upon close examination, problems are revealed in both the structure and the content of the framework Graham uses to interpret the Canons. Without a more reliable framework for interpreting the text, it seems best to remain skeptical about claims that the Canons represent evidence for the study of logic in early China
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/605537
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Manufacturing Mohism in the Mencius.Thomas Radice - 2011 - Asian Philosophy 21 (2):139 - 152.
Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought.Chris Fraser - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):1-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Associate Professor of Religion.Jane Geaney - 1999 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Mohist Canons.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science.A. C. Graham - 1978 - School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
The Neo-Mohist Conception of Bian (Disputation).Chaehyun Chong - 1999 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (1):1-19.
'Women in Music': A Reply to Gordon Graham.D. Shaw - 2001 - British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (1):84-87.
Inquiry as a Transcendental Activity.A. C. Genova - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):1 – 20.
Later Mohist Logic, Lei, Classes, and Sorts.Thierry Lucas - 2005 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):349–365.
Added to PP index
2012-02-11

Total downloads
15 ( #344,396 of 2,210,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #80,404 of 2,210,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature