Analysis 18 (3):49-56 (1957)
The author contends that moral utterances and imperatives have different logical features. He discusses r m hare's "language of morals" in terms of his distinction between plain imperatives and deontic utterances. (staff)
|Keywords||Frege-Geach problem deontic logic imperatives|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Problem with the Frege–Geach Problem.Nate Charlow - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):635-665.
Logic and Semantics for Imperatives.Nate Charlow - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):617-664.
Expressive-Assertivism.By Daniel R. Boisvert - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):169–203.
New Foundations for Imperative Logic I: Logical Connectives, Consistency, and Quantifiers.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2008 - Noûs 42 (4):529-572.
Similar books and articles
Norm Performatives and Deontic Logic.Rosja Mastop - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):83-105.
On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic.Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli - 1986 - Philosophia 16 (3-4):293-305.
Performatives and Imperatives.Anna Brożek - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):17-34.
Dynamic Models in Imperative Logic (Imperatives in Action: Changing Minds and Norms).Berislav Žarnić - 2011 - In Anna Brozek, Jacek Jadacki & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Theory of Imperatives from Different Points of Wiev. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Added to index2009-09-11
Total downloads77 ( #68,390 of 2,171,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #76,305 of 2,171,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?