After the “Death of Man”: From Philosophical Anthropology to Historical Anthropology


Abstract
The first part of the article (§§ 1-3) illustrates the critical relation the authors establish with the leading figures of philosophical anthropology in terms of their engagement with “world-openness” (Weltoffenheit). This notion cannot be reduced to the objectivity that confronts man as a spiritual being, as in Max Scheler, but rather makes it possible to grasp the limits of distancing objectification; in Arnold Gehlen, the coercion to action derived from the indeterminacy of man’s relation with the world is not sufficient to comprehend the role of culture for the constitution of the human animal itself; and with the biological means utilized by Helmuth Plessner it is not possible to account entirely for the human capacity to establish relations by means of society. Historical anthropology, as the second part (§§ 4-5) of the article shows, aims to respond to such deficiencies by bringing to light the numerous historical and cultural forms of openness to a plurality of worlds. Freeing itself of any abstract and binding anthropological norm that claims to define the essence of man, historical anthropology investigates human structures and phenomena through a series of transdisciplinary studies centering on themes such as the body, ritual, mimesis and the performative dimension in its entirety, performance and performativity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,128
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animality, Sociality, and Historicity in Helmuth Plessner’s Philosophical Anthropology.Phillip Honenberger - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (5):707-729.
Eccentric Investigations of Humanity.Phillip Honenberger - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (1):56-76.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anthropology: A Continental Perspective.Christoph Wulf - 2013 - University of Chicago Press.
Philosophical Anthropology From the End of World War I to the 1940s and in a Current Perspective.Karl-Siegbert Rehberg - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1):131-152.
Hans Blumenberg's Philosophical Anthropology: After Heidegger and Cassirer.Vida Pavesich - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 421-448.
The Priority of Philosophical Anthropology Towards Ethics.Georgia Apostolopoulou - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:9-15.
Toward a Rhetoric of Anthropology.Paul Schollmeier - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (1):59 – 69.
The Social as Heaven and Hell: Pierre Bourdieu's Philosophical Anthropology.Gabriel Peters - 2012 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (1):63-86.
Max Scheler’s Tripartite Anthropology.John White - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:255-266.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
18 ( #524,887 of 2,311,514 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #753,566 of 2,311,514 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature