The Feminist Futures of Reading Diffractively: How Barad's Methodology Replaces Conflict-based Readings of Beauvoir and Irigaray
Rhizomes 30 (1) (2016)
AbstractQuantum leaps happen in texts, too. This reading of the role of the quantum leap in Karen Barad's agential realism is necessary, because arguing that the diffractive reading strategy proposed by Barad's ethico-onto-epistemology mirrors the physical phenomenon of diffraction would indeed be representationalist. Reviewing how Barad—in her own oeuvre—has transformed diffraction into an innovative reading methodology that could not only potentially challenge the epistemological underpinnings of the canonization process that is at work in feminist theory, but could also radically change the canonization practice of feminist oeuvres itself, our article embarks on a detailed examination of the ways in which the oeuvres of Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray have been mistakenly categorized and canonized in a hierarchical and Oedipalized manner. This conflict-based narrative has not only paralyzed the oeuvres of Irigaray and Beauvoir, but also has had a negative impact on the canonization of sexual difference philosophy as a whole in feminist theory. By (re)reading the oeuvres diffractively, this article brings the feminist philosophies of Beauvoir and Irigaray together by invalidating the idea that the feminist canonization process always has to run along the lines of discontinuity, Oedipalization and dialectization.
Similar books and articles
“A Different Starting Point, a Different Metaphysics”: Reading Bergson and Barad Diffractively.Iris Van Der Tuin - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (1):22 - 42.
“A Different Starting Point, a Different Metaphysics”: Reading Bergson and Barad Diffractively.Iris Van Der Tuin - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (1):22-42.
Differences: Re-Reading Beauvoir and Irigaray.Emily Anne Parker & Anne van Leeuwen (eds.) - 2017 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Simone de Beauvoir, Luce Irigaray. Una rilettura.Federica Giardini - 2016 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 28 (54).
A Critique of Normative Heterosexuality: Identity, Embodiment, and Sexual Difference in Beauvoir and Irigaray.Ofelia Schutte - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (1):40 - 62.
Luce Irigaray: the (un)dutiful daughter of psychoanalysis. A feminist ‘moving through and beyond’ the phallogocentric discourse of psychoanalysis.Evelien Geerts -
The Routledge Guidebook to de Beauvoir's the Second Sex.Nancy Bauer - 2020 - Routledge.
Feminists Reading the Canon: Luce Irigaray’s Concept of Mimesis as Reading Strategy.Gertrude Postl - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:87-93.
Feminist Philosophy and the Philosophy of Feminism: Irigaray and the History of Western Metaphysics.Claire Colebrook - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (1):79 - 98.
Irigaray's To Be Two: The Problem of Evil and the Plasticity of Incarnation.Ada S. Jaarsma - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (1):44-62.
Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW]Lynda Haas - 1993 - Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Diffracting diffractive readings of texts as methodology: Some propositions.Karin Murris & Vivienne Bozalek - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1504-1517.
References found in this work
No references found.