Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):433-444 (2006)

Steven Geisz
University of Tampa
abstract A common bit of public political wisdom advises that in certain three‐way elections, one should cast a strategic vote for one of the top two candidates rather than a conscience‐driven vote for a third candidate, since doing otherwise amounts to ‘throwing one's vote away’. In this paper, I examine the possible justifications for this pragmatic advice to vote strategically. I argue that the most direct argument behind such advice fails to motivate strategic voting in large‐scale elections, since there is no significant chance that one's own vote will alter the outcome of the election, even in plausible close‐call cases. In short, the lack of probable pragmatic effect undermines the pragmatic motivation for altering one's baseline voting behavior. However, an indirect argument succeeds in motivating strategic voting in some scenarios. Such an indirect argument relies on the possibility of one acquiring an obligation to engage in public strategic campaigning for one of the top two candidates. In many cases in which one strategically campaigns, one will, indirectly, acquire an obligation to vote strategically in accord with one's prior public campaign activities. Thus, the common bit of political wisdom about strategic voting can be justified, though only indirectly.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.2006.23.issue-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Indirect Argument for Strategic Voting.Steven F. Geisz - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):433–444.
People Do Not Have a Duty to Avoid Voting Badly: Reply to Brennan.Marcus Arvan - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1):1-6.
Is There a Right Not to Vote?Heather Lardy - 2004 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2):303-321.
Japan's Multimember SNTV System and Strategic Voting: A Rejoinder.Patrick Fournier & Masaru Kohno - 2001 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 2 (2):241-242.
An Argument for Voting Abstention.Nathan Hanna - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):279-286.
The Manipulation of Voting Systems.David Hartvigsen - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (1):13-21.
Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote.Jason Brennan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):535-549.
Strategic Contexts of the Vote on Political Reform Bills.Sadafumi Kawato - 2000 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 1 (1):23-51.
Cognitive Impairment and the Right to Vote: A Strategic Approach.Linda Barclay - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):146-159.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #781,070 of 2,445,270 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,270 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes