Disattendability, Civil Inattention, and the Epistemology of Privacy

Philosophical Analysis 31:151-181 (2014)

Authors
Axel Gelfert
Technische Universität Berlin
Abstract
The concept of privacy is intimately related to epistemological concepts such as information and knowledge, yet for the longest time had received only scant attention from epistemologists. This has begun to change in recent years, and different philosophical accounts have been proposed. On the liberal model of privacy, what privacy aims at is the protection of individuals from interference in personal matters. On the (more narrowly epistemological) informational model, privacy is a matter of limiting access to (or maintaining control over) certain types of information. Furthermore, it is sometimes claimed that privacy aims at preventing the formation of (potentially negative) judgments by others. This paper compares and contrasts the various approaches and identifies a number of shortcomings. It then outlines an alternative account, the disattendability/civil inattention model of privacy, according to which what constitutes a breach of privacy is neither the acquisition of new information per se, nor the formation of judgments by others, but the fact that undue attention is being paid to routinized (or otherwise unobtrusive) aspects of the target’s everyday life. This account, it is argued, is explanatorily superior to its competitors, in that it accounts both for the cultural contingency of privacy conventions and for the emergence of new threats to privacy (e.g. from electronic surveillance). The paper concludes by reflecting on remaining tensions within the proposed account of privacy and by commenting on its social ramifications.
Keywords epistemology  privacy  disattendability  epistemology of privacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,822
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Privacy and the Judgment of Others.Jeffery L. Johnson - 1989 - Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (2):157-168.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
The Epistemic Account of Privacy.Martijn Blaauw - 2013 - Episteme 10 (2):167-177.
Privacy as Informational Commodity.Jarek Gryz - 2013 - Proceedings of IACAP Conference.
An Intrusion Theory of Privacy.George E. Panichas - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):145-161.
Annabelle Lever: On Privacy.D. Mokrosinska - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):665-666.
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Is There a Right to Privacy?Steven Davis - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
Does Privacy Undermine Community.Mark Tunick - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):517-534.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-12-12

Total views
43 ( #194,389 of 2,265,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #360,192 of 2,265,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature