Frames, Choice-Reversal, and Consent

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):1049-1057 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently Jason Hanna has argued that a particular type of susceptibility to framing effects—namely, the tendency to reverse one’s choice between certain logically equivalent frames—invalidates actual tokens of consent. Here I argue that this claim is false: proneness to choice-reversal per se between the relevant types of frames does not invalidate consent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent and the Problem of Framing Effects.Jason Hanna - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):517-531.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Can Broad Consent Be Informed Consent?M. Sheehan - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):226-235.
Some Limits of Informed Consent.O. O'Neill - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):4-7.
Free Choice and Patient Best Interests.Emma Bullock - 2016 - Health Care Analysis 24 (4):374-392.
Informed Consent and Routinisation.Thomas Ploug & Soren Holm - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):214-218.
Fickle Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):25-40.
Parental Consent and the Use of Dead Children's Bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Safe, Sane, and Consensual—Consent and the Ethics of BDSM.Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):265-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-14

Downloads
47 (#246,871)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luke Gelinas
Albany Medical College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations