A Kantian argument against abortion

Philosophical Studies 49 (1):83 - 98 (1986)
Authors
Harry Gensler
Loyola University, Chicago
Abstract
I criticize various anti- and pro-abortion arguments. then, using the principle that a consistent person who thinks it permissible to do a to another will also consent to the idea of someone doing a to him in similar circumstances, i argue that most people could not consistently hold that abortion is normally permissible. i discuss possible objections and distinguish my view from hare's
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00372407
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,507
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Abortion and the Argument From Innocence.Marvin Kohl - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):147-151.
Abortion, Competing Entitlements, and Parental Responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
On a Kantian Argument Against Abortion.Bryan Wilson - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 53 (1):119 - 130.
Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion.Lara Denis - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):117-37.
A Kantian Argument Against Abortion.Harry J. Gensler - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (1):83 - 98.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
389 ( #9,141 of 2,268,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #55,459 of 2,268,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature