Cognitive Science Is and Should Be Pluralistic

Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):884-891 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Núñez et al (2019) argue (1) that the field of Cognitive Science has failed, in that it has not arrived at a cohesive theory, and (2) that this is contrary to the intentions of the founders. Their survey of publication and citation patterns bears out the lack of a cohesive theory and also provides corroboration for (3) the concern that the field is becoming unbalanced, with psychology overweighted (Gentner, 2010). I will argue against points (1) and (2), but agree with point (3). My central claim is that cognitive science was never meant to have one unified theoretical framework, nor should it have.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychology in Cognitive Science: 1978–2038.Dedre Gentner - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):328-344.
Cognitive Anthropology Is a Cognitive Science.James S. Boster - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):372-378.
Religion as an Evolutionary Byproduct: A Critique of the Standard Model.Russell Powell & Steve Clarke - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):457-486.
Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.Dedre Gentner - 2003 - Nature Publishing Group.
Analogical reasoning, psychology of.Dedre Gentner - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group. pp. 106-12.
On (not) defining cognition.Colin Allen - 2017 - Synthese 194 (11):4233-4249.


Added to PP

25 (#536,306)

6 months
3 (#433,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?