Raja Bahlul
Doha Institute for Graduate Studies
The paper offers a critical examination of Ghazali’s main arguments against the views of the philosophers on causation. The authors argue that Ghazali’s definition of miracles as "departure from the usual course of events" carries at least two meanings, only one of which is in conflict with necessary causal relations. The authors also argue that Ghazali’s desire to uphold the possibility of miracles need not constrain him to repudiate the idea of necessary connection, since he is able to explain miracles in ways that are compatible with belief in causality and necessary connection. The authors conclude by examining some arguments to the effect that Ghazali’s attempt to hold on to both miracles and necessary connection is inherently unstable, and explore directions which Ghazalians may take in order to counter these arguments
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1057-0608
DOI 10.1017/S1057060800091039
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Causality and Determinism.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1971 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Nature, God, and Creation: A Necessitarian Case.Yasin Ramazan Basaran - 2018 - Dissertation, Indiana University Bloomington
İslam Düşüncesinde Bazı Mucize Telakkileri.Metin Pay - 2016 - Dini Araştırmalar 18 (47).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
64 ( #155,978 of 2,411,831 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,831 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes