Leveling the playing field between mind and machine: A reply to McCall

Journal of Philosophy 97 (8):456-452 (2000)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Epistemology  Machine  Mind  Sentence  Truth  Goedel  Mccall, S
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/jphil200097837
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,511
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Minds, Machines and Godel.John R. Lucas - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (April-July):112-127.
Human and Machine Logic: A Rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (August):155-6.
Machine as Mind.Herbert A. Simon - 1995 - In Peter Millican & Andy Clark (eds.), Android Epistemology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Godel's Theorem and the Mind... Again.Graham Priest - 1994 - In M. Michael & John O'Leary-Hawthorne (eds.), Philosophy in Mind: The Place of Philosophy in the Study of Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 41-52.
Can a Turing Machine Know That the Gödel Sentence is True?Storrs McCall - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (10):525 - 532.
McCall's Gödelian Argument is Invalid.Panu Raatikainen - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69.
Leveling the Playing Field Between Mind and Machine.Daniel J. Velleman - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (8):456-461.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
23 ( #222,570 of 2,180,705 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,383 of 2,180,705 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums