Philosophical “Paradigms” of Education

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:43-55 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper explores the links between philosophy and learning with a view to highlight some of the today’s most influential philosophical “paradigms” of education. The concepts of “paradigm” and “philosophical paradigm of education” are discussed – and nuanced - based on some explicit references to them in the current philosophical and pedagogical literature. While taking into account all the different ways in which philosophy may be inquired with regard to its influence on education, the paper focuses merely on philosophical contributions to the understanding of specific issues such as the human potential for learning; the concepts of cognition and learning; epistemological and value assumptions in teaching and learning; and psycho-social aspects exploring the relationshipsbetween the self and the “other” via communication and other forms of social interaction. While assuming that the relationships between philosophy and education are not unidirectional (in the sense that not only philosophy impacts on education, but also vice-versa, education issues may trigger philosophical reflection and debates), the paper analyses how different contemporary influential philosophical orientations (i.e. Pragmatism and Neo-pragmatism; The Critical Theory; Post-modern and Relativistic approaches; Constructivism) paved their way into educational thinking, policy making and teaching and learning practices. Whereas acknowledging that philosophy is not the only strong “foundation” for education, the paper stresses nevertheless the benefits of a reflective attitude ineducation with regard to its main (philosophical) assumptions. Choices in education are not always following a reflective pattern and changes are very often introduced because they are fashionable. Recurrent interrogations on important philosophical assumptions of educational theories, policies and practices may yet bring about a better balance between “innovation” and “tradition” and/or between “change” and “stability” while avoiding the many pitfalls of new andattractive, yet ephemeral, education fashions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informal Home Education: Philosophical Aspirations put into Practice.Alan Thomas & Harriet Pattison - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (2):141-154.
The Concept of Philosophical Education.Steinar Bøyum - 2010 - Educational Theory 60 (5):543-559.
Consciousness-based education: a foundation for teaching and learning in the academic disciplines.Dara Llewellyn & Craig Pearson (eds.) - 2011 - Fairfield, Iowa 52557: Consciousness-Based Books, Maharishi University of Management.
Philosophy of education.Nel Noddings - 1995 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education.Harvey Siegel (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Some Contributions of Philosophy to Education.Israel Scheffler - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 3:193-200.
The Future of Teacher Education.Alis Oancea & Janet Orchard - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):574-588.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
51 (#306,042)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references