- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Tinged shareholder theory: or what’s so special about stakeholders?
Business Ethics 8 (2):117-127 (2002)
Abstract
This paper contrasts the normative foundations of the stakeholder and shareholder theories of the firm. It demonstrates how the shareholder theory of the firm appears to have at least as much normative support as stakeholder theory and suggests that a way forward may be for a variant of pure shareholder theory to emerge.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Tinged shareholder theory: Or what's so special about stakeholders?Geoff Moore - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):117–127.
Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business.Bruce Langtry - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):431-443.
Do shareholders have obligations to stakeholders?Earl W. Spurgin - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297.
Does Employee Ownership Benefit Value Creation? The Case of France (2001–2005).Thierry Poulain-Rehm & Xavier Lepers - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):325-340.
Stakeholders and directors' duties: Law, theory and evidence.Shelley D. Marshall & Ian Ramsay and - unknown
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
A model of value creation: Strategic view. [REVIEW]Cengiz Haksever, Radha Chaganti & Ronald G. Cook - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (3):295-307.
The Obligatory Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jim I. Unah - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 7:43-48.
Compensating Outside Directors with Stock: The Impact on Non-Primary Stakeholders. [REVIEW]Yuval Deutsch & Mike Valente - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):67-85.
Stakeholder Risk as Experienced by Non-Shareholder Stakeholders.Whitney Davis & Harry J. van Buren Iii - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:431-436.
Corporate democracy and the rights of shareholders.William Irvine - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):99 - 108.
Citizens as Contractualist Stakeholders.David Silver - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):3-13.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-25
Downloads
31 (#484,163)
6 months
5 (#510,007)
2014-03-25
Downloads
31 (#484,163)
6 months
5 (#510,007)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Business Ethics and the 'End of History' in Corporate Law.Joseph Heath - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):5-20.
Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation.Yves Fassin - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):879 - 888.
Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation.Yves Fassin - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):879-888.
“Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here”: On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups.James A. H. S. Hine & Lutz Preuss - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):381-393.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-9lpj8 uwo