It is the purpose of this comment to explore a hypothetical situation, to take the facts of the Quinlan case as revealed in the New Jersey Superior Court and the New Jersey Supreme Court opinions and interpret them under applicable Ohio law.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Teaching a Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals.Kevin D. Ashley - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):321-370.
Twenty-Five Years After Quinlan: A Review of the Jurisprudence of Death and Dying. [REVIEW]Norman L. Cantor - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 29 (2):182-196.
The Ethical Theory of Clarence Irving Lewis. By J. Roger Saydah. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press; Toronto: Copp Clark. 1969. Pp. X, 171. $8.25. [REVIEW]J. T. Stevenson - 1970 - Dialogue 9 (3):462-465.
The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments.Susanne Bobzien - 1997 - Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #842,057 of 2,143,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,161 of 2,143,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.