Erkenntnis 62 (3):295-319 (2005)
This paper offers one formal reason why it may often be inappropriate to hold, of two conflicting desires, that the first must be weaker than, stronger than, or of the same strength as the second. The explanation of this fact does not rely on vagueness or epistemological problems in determining the strengths of desires. Nor does it make use of the problematic notion of incommensurability. Rather, the suggestion is that the motivational capacities of many desires might best be characterized by two values, neither of which should be interpreted as strength.
|Keywords||Desire Metaphysics Motivation Strength Value|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes.Fred Dretske - 1988 - MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Puzzle of Imaginative Desire.Amy Kind - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):421-439.
Wants and Desires: A Critique of Conativist Theory of Motivation.Chris Meyers - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:357-370.
The Mysteries of Desire: A Discussion. [REVIEW]Abraham S. Roth - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 123 (3):273-293.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #101,115 of 2,172,656 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #172,670 of 2,172,656 )
How can I increase my downloads?