Common morality versus specified principlism: Reply to Richardson

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):308 – 322 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his article 'Specifying, balancing and interpreting bioethical principles' (Richardson, 2000), Henry Richardson claims that the two dominant theories in bioethics - principlism, put forward by Beauchamp and Childress in Principles of Bioethics , and common morality, put forward by Gert, Culver and Clouser in Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals - are deficient because they employ balancing rather than specification to resolve disputes between principles or rules. We show that, contrary to Richardson's claim, the major problem with principlism, either the original version, or the specified principlism of Richardson, is that it conceives of morality as being composed of free-standing principles, rather than as common morality conceives it, as being a complete public system, composed of rules, ideals, morally relevant features, and a procedure for determining when a rule can be justifiably violated.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personalism versus Principlism in Bioethics.Tadeusz Biesaga - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 8 (1):23-34.
The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism by Rosamond Rhodes. [REVIEW]Elizabeth Lanphier - 2022 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 15 (2):174-178.
Common Morality as an Alternative to Principlism.K. Danner Clouser - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):219-236.
The method of 'principlism': A critique of the critique.B. Andrew Lustig - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):487-510.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
113 (#190,282)

6 months
15 (#210,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reconciling Lists of Principles in Bioethics.Robert M. Veatch - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):540-559.
Abortion, euthanasia, and the limits of principlism.Brieann Rigby & Xavier Symons - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (4):549-556.
Bioethics as a second-order discipline: Who is not a bioethicist?Loretta Kopelman - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):601 – 628.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references