Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):308 – 322 (2000)

In his article 'Specifying, balancing and interpreting bioethical principles' (Richardson, 2000), Henry Richardson claims that the two dominant theories in bioethics - principlism, put forward by Beauchamp and Childress in Principles of Bioethics , and common morality, put forward by Gert, Culver and Clouser in Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals - are deficient because they employ balancing rather than specification to resolve disputes between principles or rules. We show that, contrary to Richardson's claim, the major problem with principlism, either the original version, or the specified principlism of Richardson, is that it conceives of morality as being composed of free-standing principles, rather than as common morality conceives it, as being a complete public system, composed of rules, ideals, morally relevant features, and a procedure for determining when a rule can be justifiably violated.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3;1-h;ft308
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,973
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reconciling Lists of Principles in Bioethics.Robert M. Veatch - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):540-559.
What Should Be Taught in Courses on Social Ethics?Alan Tapper - forthcoming - Research in Ethical Issues in Organisations 23.
Bioethics as a Second-Order Discipline: Who is Not a Bioethicist?Loretta Kopelman - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):601 – 628.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Method of 'Principlism': A Critique of the Critique.B. Andrew Lustig - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):487-510.
Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles.Henry S. Richardson - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):285 – 307.
The Principlism Debate: A Critical Overview.Richard B. Davis - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):85-105.
The Hedgehog and the Borg: Common Morality in Bioethics.John D. Arras - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):11-30.
Perseverations on a Critical Theme.B. Andrew Lustig - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (5):491-502.


Added to PP index

Total views
81 ( #116,347 of 2,344,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #120,670 of 2,344,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes