Any system based on axioms is incomplete because the axioms cannot be proven from the system, just believed. But one system can be less-incomplete than other. Neutrosophy is less-incomplete than many other systems because it contains them. But this does not mean that it is finished, and it can always be improved. The comments presented here are an attempt to make Neutrosophy even less-incomplete. I argue that less-incomplete ideas are more useful, since we cannot perceive truth or falsity or indeterminacy independently of a context, and are therefore relative. Absolute being and relative being are defined. Also the "silly theorem problem" is posed, and its partial solution described. The issues arising from the incompleteness of our contexts are presented. We also note the relativity and dependance of logic to a context. We propose "metacontextuality" as a paradigm for containing as many contexts as we can, in order to be less-incomplete and discuss some possible consequences.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Reality, Systems and Impure Systems.J. Nescolarde-Selva & J. L. Usó-Doménech - 2014 - Foundations of Science 19 (3):289-306.
Similar books and articles
Bargaining with Incomplete Information an Axiomatic Approach.Joachim Rosenmüller - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (2):105-146.
An Abuse of Context in Semantics: The Case of Incomplete Definite Descriptions.Ernest Lepore - manuscript
Incompleteness and the Barcan Formula.M. J. Cresswell - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (4):379 - 403.
Church's Problem Revisited.Orna Kupferman & Moshe Y. Vardi - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):245-263.
What Tipper is Ready For: A Semantics for Incomplete Predicates.Christopher Gauker - 2012 - Noûs 46 (1):61-85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #311,371 of 2,158,842 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,842 )
How can I increase my downloads?