Inwiefern sind die mathematischen sätze analytisch?

Philosophia Mathematica (2):145-157 (1972)
A SUMMARY IN ENGLISH [by Editor]The problem is to find out whether mathematical propositions are analytical, and if so, or if not, to what extent.Kant defined the analyticity in terms of Cartesian res extensa, exemplified by “A body is extended”, while he considered, because of such examples, mathematical propositions to be synthetic. The recent studies in set theory by Gödel, P.J.Cohen, etc., indicate, however, that such a proposition as the continuum hypothesis is certainly not “analytic (tautological)” in the strict sense of logicists. Rather a small portion, comparatively speaking, of mathematical propositions must therefore be considered analytic relative to the definitions of fundamental conrepts in logic. Axioms, for example, are per definitionem non-analytic. Other problems that demand reöxaminations are, for instance: 1. Why is there only one unique series of the natural numbers? 2. On which ground is the factual eminence of Euclidean geometry to be founded? etc. The two assertions that mathematical propositions are analytic and that they are synthetic a priori are thus not at all contradictory; they are, to begin with, not even mutually exclusive Possibilities
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/s1-9.2.145
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,453
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Hermann Weidemann (1982). Aussagesatz und Sachverhalt. Grazer Philosophische Studien 18:75-99.
Andreas Kemmerling (1990). Gedanken und ihre Teile. Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:1-30.
Gerhard Frey (1970). Hermeneutische und hypothetisch-deduktive Methode. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 1 (1):24-40.
Werner Loh (1984). Vorurteile und Wahn im logisch-mathematischen Grundlagenstreit und Probleme empirischer Begründung. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):211-231.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #500,296 of 1,925,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,590 of 1,925,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.