Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):303-324 (2002)
In The Sources of Normativity, Christine Korsgaard presents and defends a neo-Kantian theory of normativity. Her initial account of reasons seems to make them dependent upon the practical identity of the agent, and upon the value the agent must place on her own humanity. This seems to make all reasons agent-relative. But Korsgaard claims that arguments similar to Wittgenstein’s private-language argument can show that reasons are in fact essentially agent-neutral. This paper explains both of Korsgaard’s Wittgensteinian arguments, and shows why neither of them work. The paper also provides a brief sketch of a different Wittgensteinian account of reasons that distinguishes the normative role of justification from that of requirement. On this account, the real agent-neutrality of reasons applies to their justificatory role, but not to their requiring role
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy of Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Wittgenstein, Korsgaard and the Publicity of Reasons.Joshua Gert - 2013 - Inquiry (5):1-21.
Similar books and articles
Rationality and Reflection.Jeffrey S. Seidman - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):201-214.
Reason and Love: A Non-Reductive Analysis of the Normativity of Agent-Relative Reasons. [REVIEW]Van Willigenburg Theo - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):45-62.
Normativity and Interpersonal Reasons.Ken O'Day - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):61-87.
Self-Consciousness, Normativity and Abysmal Freedom.William F. Bristow - 2006 - Inquiry 49 (6):498 – 523.
Egoism and the Publicity of Reason: A Reply to Korsgaard.Michael Cholbi - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (3):491-517.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #60,156 of 2,164,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,957 of 2,164,581 )
How can I increase my downloads?