PhaenEx 5 (1):41-58 (2010)
AbstractThe phenomenological tradition has always had a peculiar preoccupation with light. This paper will attempt to determine how and why light appears as it does, and what this can tell us about the phenomenological understanding of light and its relevance. This will be carried out through a systematic analysis covering Husserl's study of light as "circumstance of apperception," Heidegger's interpretation of Plato's use of light as "symbol for the unsayable," and Levinas' interest in light as "rival to the 'there is'." This survey will allow us to see how light has been treated by phenomenology as a concept of central importance in the realms of perception, epistemology, and ontology. It is this multiform use that has allowed for the distinction between the concepts of "light" and "lighting" to become blurred, and has thus problematized any attempt at something like a phenomenology of light.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Light as Environment: Medicine, Health, and Values.David B. Morris - 2002 - Journal of Medical Humanities 23 (1):7-29.
Heidegger's Phenomenology as Transcendental Philosophy.Paul Gorner - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):17 – 33.
Constitution by Movement: Husserl in Light of Recent Neurobiological Findings.Jean-Luc Petit - 1999 - In Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ontology, Transcendence, and Immanence in Emmanuel Levinas' Philosophy.Bettina Bergo - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):141-180.