The Knowledge Argument

In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. MacMillan (2005)
Abstract
The definitive statement of the Knowledge Argument was formulated by Frank Jackson, in a paper entitled “Epiphenomenal Qualia” that appeared in The Philosophical Quarterly in 1982. Arguments in the same spirit had appeared earlier (Broad 1925, Robinson 1982), but Jackson’s argument is most often compared with Thomas Nagel’s argument in “What is it Like to be a Bat?” (1974). Jackson, however, takes pains to distinguish his argument from Nagel’s. This entry will follow standard practice in focusing on Jackson’s argument, though I will also describe the main points of alleged similarity and dissimilarity between these two arguments.
Keywords Dualism  Knowledge Argument  Frank Jackson
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Knowledge Argument.Torin Alter - 1999 - A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Re-Acquaintance with Qualia.John C. Bigelow & Robert Pargetter - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):353 – 378.
Jackson's Apostasy.William S. Robinson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (3):277-293.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
304 ( #10,491 of 2,192,005 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #4,510 of 2,192,005 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature