Why do we need to coordinate when classifying kin?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):385-386 (2010)
Abstract
We suggest that there are two coordination games when it comes to understanding kin terminology. Jones' article focuses on the linguistic coordination inherent in developing meaningful kin terminologies, alluding briefly to the benefits of these kin terminologies for coordination in other domains. We enhance Jones' discussion by tracing the links between the structure of kin terminologies and their functionsDOI
10.1017/s0140525x10001950
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
When dominance and sex are both right.James A. Schirillo & Melissa Fox - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):612-613.
Processing Spatial Relations With Different Apertures of Attention.Bruno Laeng, Matia Okubo, Ayako Saneyoshi & Chikashi Michimata - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (2):297-329.
Coordinate Formalism on Abstract Hilbert Space: Kinematics of a Quantum Measurement. [REVIEW]Alexey A. Kryukov - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 33 (3):407-443.
Affective Disorders of the State: A Spinozan Diagnosis and Cure.Ericka L. Tucker - 2013 - Journal of East-West Thought 3 (2):97-120.
Classifying conditionals: The traditional way is right.Jonathan Bennett - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):331-354.
Classifying ‘conditionals’: The traditional way is wrong.V. H. Dudman - 2000 - Analysis 60 (2):147–147.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
40 (#293,571)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
2013-10-27
Downloads
40 (#293,571)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Kinship, lineage, and an evolutionary perspective on cooperative hunting groups in Indonesia.Michael S. Alvard - 2003 - Human Nature 14 (2):129-163.
